'Accepting the space-time model - while separating it from its main distortions'

'Accepting the space-time model - while separating it from its main distortions'

This is a vision of branching scientific models of the Universe - scale models of reality - within one overarching view of the Universe. 

Since everything in existence is interactive, and everything changes relatively in every moment, no scientific model will be 100% accurate - but it might be 99.999999 % accurate - more or less. (Im not talking about the space-time model applying to its areas of distortion here)

Using one mathematical model (a TOE - theory of everything within the Universe) for every practical application of science - does not make any sense - when for most applications - it will be enough to be accurate to a lesser extent.

Furthermore, to be 100% accurate, one would have to map the exact location, direction, acceleration, mass, and charge - of every particle in the Universe.   This will never happen - so one mathematical theory will never be 100% accurate - for interactive mass and energy within the Universe.

It is important to accept that all models of reality will have limitations - and therefore distortions where they are integrated with other scales of space or other forms of matter or energy (eg as gases interact with massive gravitational or EM field forces, fission or fusion, when nearing a cosmic recycling center (black hole).   This necessitates a merger of thermodynamics, QED, gravity (likely a modified law of gravity), etc. (which exhibits the need for a separate theory at the scale of a black hole).

We cannot expect to apply one model of reality - to all of reality at once for all practical purposes.   Some scientists have been trying to ram everything into the model of General Relativity space-time for years now.  

It should be viewed - that good science - will embrace a collection of models - that best suit the frame and scale of the observation.

Frame - and scale - will determine which model (or projection) best suits the application.   The general quantum view - has QED - quantum electrodynamics.   Gases have the laws of thermodynamics.   Our cosmic neighborhood - has General Relativity space-time model.   The cosmic recycling center (what scientists call a black hole) should have its own model as well.   For the universe as a whole - I submit Space-Interaction theory - where the ever-evolving moment encompasses all of these models, and includes the following concepts, among others:

Space-Interaction theory includes the following concepts (among others):

1.

Light waves eroding over billions of light years through the fog of space

2.

Compound and collective gravity are two components of gravity - which manifest themselves as distinct forces within galaxies and galaxy clusters.

Collective gravity is the 'gravitational atmosphere' of a galaxy and tries to balance the gravity throughout the body of stars - and essentially ties them together in a web that rotates as a single entity.  

Compoud gravity is centered at the center of mass - whether in a galaxy or galaxy cluster - and results in an accelerated form of gravity - as massive objects converge.

This results in a gravitational tug of war for each star between the galaxy center of mass - and the body of stars held together by collective gravity.

The galaxy center exerts its compound gravity on the collective body of stars in a galaxy - effectively raising the calculation for gravity.   Collective gravity ensures that the gravitational calculations are fairly uniform throughout the body of stars - as it tries to evenly distribute the gravitational attraction throughout the body of stars.

3.

Eroded EM radiation is shared across billions of light years - recycled back into (mass dominant particles) as the light loses its waviness - and preserves a conservation of mass-energy (not just energy, not just mass, but both - as they exchange places in a continuous recycling through cosmic recycling centers (black holes, galaxies, and star events) and flux between expansion (energy dominated) and contraction (gravity, mass dominated)

4.

There is far less cosmic Expansion than in current models (and therefore far less  missing dark energy).

5.

No ability to trace back to a single Big Bang event (due to the complex nature of billions of years of change), and the Universe being far older than 14 billion years - but could have been created at any point.)